 |
| Screenshot of my coggle diagram, 11 Sept. 2015 <https://coggle.it/diagram/VfOhfZ84HeI7W_Bj> |
Saturday, September 12, 2015
Clusters in My Controversy
In this post I will be talking about the process that I have done in creating a web diagram of the arguments from both sides of my controversy. I will also provide a link to this diagram for you to see what this looks like and how this web is constructed.
In this web I arranged the questions into two catagories: one for the for and the other for the ney. I clustered the two groups questions together on each side and answered the questions given giving specific names detail and specific information. This is going to help in the long run since the entire thing is already practically written out the only thing left is to write it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It's interesting to see how many of us used Coggle for our cluster! Perhaps this was because it was the easiest platform to navigate and didn't require downloading anything. Your cluster is shaped very differently from mine. I separated my controversy into three subcategories and branched off from there, while you had many different branch offs. Your cluster also has a lot more in-depth analysis than mine. It kind of makes me not want to read it all, but I'm sure it will be helpful for you! Good luck on your QRG!
ReplyDeleteEven though you used Coggle and I used Google Draw (I was afraid I would have to create another account to use Coggle), I think our webs turned out very similar (albeit yours is much more polished). Our similarities include how you broke your web up from a main idea into associated topics and sub-topics as well as labeling the interactions between the various components of the web. Best of luck on your QRG (though I'm sure it can't be hard now!).
ReplyDelete