Considering Types

In this post I will be figuring out which of the types of arguments I will be using and why I chose that particular type.

Garcia, Javier, "Broken Text" Uploaded 19 Dec 2005 via flickr.com, Attribution noncommercial 2.0 Generic.

For my argument type I think that I will use is the causal argument because it fits best with the purpose I am trying to propose. I chose this because I think knowing where and how the debate started is helpful in finding a solution to the problem. I do not know of any possible solutions to this problem besides not getting into fights with other disciplines so I do not think that a proposal argument will be helpful here. There are also no current solutions to this debate there for both the evaluative and refutation types, there is nothing to evaluate or refute. Finally the position type is not helpful for the same reason that the evaluative and refutation types are not helpful. This leaves me with just arguing about what caused this argument, which is actually exactly what this type of debate needs added to it as opposed to just the arguments by both the neuroscience and physics fields.